Any Information Technology
manager lives in fear that some leading, widely-read
business periodical will publish an article touting
the amazing benefits of a technologically-based business
process, such as Data Warehousing. Some senior executive
inevitably reads it, walks down to the IT Department
and announces, "Let's buy one of these!" It
is the latest (though probably not the final) chapter
in the search for the "silver bullet" - that
long-awaited, eagerly-anticipated "killer application"
which will finally deliver the promised return on the
IT investment.
Okay, so now you have "bought" a Data Warehouse.
The votes are coming in, and the results are not encouraging:
"Response time is too slow!"
"I can produce nice reports, but I still don't
have any real insight into my business."
"If we had bought the right technology, we would
be getting better results!"
"We spent $2 million on this project! Where's my
ROI?"
What happened?
This litany
of unmet expectations points to three reasons
why Data Warehouse projects fail: |
- Driven by technology instead of business
need
- Treating the Data Warehouse as a destination
instead of a journey
- Inability to provide answers to meaningful
questions.
|
|
You see, the problem is that you really can't just
"buy one of these" Data Warehouses.
While you may indeed be able to buy the technology components,
you can't just buy their integration with the business
strategy, the culture, or the organization. Successful
implementation of a Data Warehouse requires, among other
things, a significant investment of time and energy
on the part of many, maybe most, of those who will be
its users, to ensure that the end result meets their
needs. It is a tedious, difficult, lengthy, and frequently
contentious process. What's more, as this article explains,
much of this time and energy come from the most senior
executive levels of the organization - the very people
who are inclined to decree, "Let's buy one of these!"
Well, even though you can't just "buy one of these"
Data Warehouses, maybe we have reached the point where
technology, business demand, frustration, and process
insight have converged on something that really can
deliver the long-promised return.
There are a growing number of successful examples which
prove not only that it can be done, but also that the
sometimes dramatic results are more than worth the investment.
The purpose of this article is to further define these
reasons for failure, and to provide some ways by which
an organization can avoid these pitfalls as it implements
its own Data Warehouse. Some will argue that this list
is incomplete - that there are other essential points
of equal importance.
The fact is that many books have been written, explaining
all the problems and pitfalls of Data Warehousing. It
would be sheer folly to represent the thoughts that
can reasonably be captured in a brief magazine article
as comprehensive treatment of this subject. Still, if
an organization can avoid the three critical failures
mentioned above, it will most likely be delighted with
the outcome. Furthermore, it will have put a process
in place that allows the "journey" to continue
beyond the design and implementation phase.
Driven by technology instead of business need...
When the edict comes from on high to go "buy one
of these," most often the technologists assume
control of the project, and the focus becomes putting
the technology in place. The Data Warehouse project
becomes technology-driven. The problem is that an enterprise
Data Warehouse is not merely a technology problem. There
are several things that must be done to avoid this critical
failure. |